Display MoreHello SneakyDave
Still not got over your 10 year obsession stalking both Adam Howard, and me I see....
Who is betting this account above is posting under a 'PROXY' all the time and registered with a thrown-away email
I reported your post above. You shouldn't be posting full names of people in posts here, and where they come from without their permission.
10 years 
Display MoreBernie is a guy that Adam supported for president. Adam is a user who has been banned from all the major forum software sites, including WBB, XenForo, IPS, vBulletin, and so on.
Adam is someone that can't get along with anyone else. Someone who thinks he is smarter than everyone else. Someone that tries to write like he is intelligent, but has the grammar and spelling of a monkey. Someone who claims he was in the special forces, but the only special forces he was in (if you saw this boy) is the Krispy Kreme VIP Club. Someone that claims to have run/ran large forums, but never really did. Someone that tried to bullshit the WBB devs into thinking he ran a forum with millions of posts, but he never did. Adam is also someone that claims to have been a delegate of Bernie, but when called out on twitter about it, went silent and couldn't prove it.
Sounds like a nut job, right? I think Adam is related to Gary Thomas Bolton, from the UK, since they are both so alike.
Sorry Marci and others here think you are Adam.
Our mistake.
I'm not sure which is more disturbing. Your description of that poor fella, the fact that you would confuse folks for him or the fact that you seem obsessed with him. 
Still Wong Adam, sorry.
BTW, Bernie lost, get over it.
I'm not going to argue on who I am. That would be silly. Who is Bernie?
Assume you did first purchase 4.0 and then upgraded to 4.1 a year later, you still saved more by using WoltLab. 
I can use those savings for whatever I wish including other products and services.
I think you are wong Adam, there was an upgrade fee from 4.0 to 4.1 wasn't there?
I'm sorry, but I'm not Adam.
You were not required to upgrade to 4.1, but assume that you did first purchase WoltLab at the time of the release of 4.1 you still saved more by using WoltLab.
I can use those savings for whatever I wish including other products and services.
Cheaper? It is 90 US dollar, how is that cheaper?
I can use those savings for whatever I wish including other products and services.
I actually do like the new design. At first I was a bit surprised but it has grown on me. The only change I would make is to remove avatar next to the quick reply. But that can be done via some simple css and so I'm not worried about it.
Who is Adam Howard?
Google seems to suggest that he is either a firm director or author.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=adam+howard&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Somebody who that wacko 'SneakyDave' keeps stalking around web 24/7 for years
Who is SneakyDave?
Then I recommend you use it Adam.
BTW, how'd that senate run work out... and have you been going to any special forces reunions?
I think you clearly mistake me for someone else.
Jesus! You don't need post an image for 'every single' new emoji.
We get the drift...
As explained... Was also testing something
The block button works. 
There is but one "deadline": When it's done.
And I would only ask that you please hold that to be true in practice.
Are you calling me a liar there?
I am calling you a good salesmen and a skilled craftsmen of public relations. And simply stating that historically, the actions would appear to have the effects of a loosely scheduled internal deadline.
You are probably seeking for new/more features, correct?
As far as I know and read on the posts there ist most likely a feature freeze now... only bugs will be dealt with until the gold release..
While more features would be nice, yes... I understand the current feature freeze and not believe leaving the beta phase is the best policy at this time.
The RC phase will take as long as we think it needs to take. This is how we've done it with every single release in the past and we have no intentions to change this.
That is not historically accurate. I do recall past releases and it seems history is repeating itself. I would simply ask that you please hold your words true though and release it only when it is actually ready.
There is no internal deadline.
Denial of internal deadline does not remove the effects of one.
The beta stage is almost complete and WoltLab Suite will enter the Release Candidate (RC) phase on December 15th along with the previously announced upgrade of woltlab.com. This site will then be switched into archive mode, preventing any new content from being added, eventually being merged into the main site at a later point of time. This means that this site will continue to exist for some time after December 15th until the merge is performed.
For those of you that already have an account on woltlab.com, we kindly ask you to double-check the email address used and to ensure that both the account on woltlab.com and on this site match. The import will merge users based on their email address, while keeping the username from woltlab.com.
We would like to take this opportunity to express our eternal gratitude towards all users that have provided us with valuable feedback and reports during the whole beta phase. Your invaluable support has paved the way to build the most outstanding and awesome version ever released by us, pushing the limits of what communities can achieve by an order of magnitude. Thank you!
Source: End of Beta on December 15th
In response, I would again like to please ask that you please delay your schedule. While I do believe WoltLab Suite 3 has come a long way, I do not yet believe it is as ready to leave the testing phase. I suspect you're planning a short RC (release candidate) phase and plan to wrap up development into the final release this December 2016 (if not early January 2017).
I would very much like to see a stable release and not have this rushed to fulfill an internal deadline.
Display MoreAh right
I was thinking about this thread here:
But you do not have more info on that ? (you opened a ticket)
You ever think you're given answers only for the sake of being given an answer, yet one that truly offers no solution? ... ie ... Something pleasing enough just long enough in hopes that the question or problem will drift out of memory.
I suspect all things relating to WoltLab and Grammarly fall into this category.
From what I heard, simply adding an SVG won't scale it. You need to have some script to do that.
True; though I do not imagine it would have been hard to add.
Which (proof otherwise not shown) it wasn't/isn't a continuation of a convo that took place out of this thread. It's a continuation of THIS thread in which was specifically commenting on that Debian and Ubuntu were "not much different". Using a logical though process one would naturally make an assumption that he was attempting to show a comparator that proved Debian and Ubuntu were alike.
His actual sentence was
"Actually, Ubuntu is not as much different from yahoo.com"
Which at best was either a mistype or a line of thinking that needed more explaining.
A youngster with half way decent thought processes
Your belittlement against others; who would harmlessly seek clarification without assuming anything, clearly shows your mentality.
Have a wonderful day.
You don't. I made an assumption that he was attempting to link to something that was "showing" that they were similar. Sometimes one has to make some extrapolations from a statement using the context of the flow of the prior conversation.
Unless his / her post is a continuation of a conversation which took place elsewhere, outside of this thread, it would still be out of context for everyone else.
Anyone have any idea how to hide the avatar (box) that is next to the quick editor?
